<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor performing US President = strong Canadian dollar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sowrey.org/2007/10/poor-performing-us-president-strong-canadian-dollar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sowrey.org/2007/10/poor-performing-us-president-strong-canadian-dollar/</link>
	<description>A miscellany of know-it-all-isms by Geoff Sowrey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 04:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.sowrey.org/2007/10/poor-performing-us-president-strong-canadian-dollar/#comment-3561</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sowrey.org/2007/10/29/poor-performing-us-president-strong-canadian-dollar/#comment-3561</guid>
		<description>So I was just having a chat with my friend Joel, who pointed out that the dollar&#039;s slide/rise (depending on which one you&#039;re looking at) isn&#039;t a result of the Prez. It&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/wibbelsman050206.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;US monetary policy&lt;/a&gt;. 

Now, both of us freely admit that this is a little bit on the incomprehensible side (macroeconomics wasn&#039;t my strong subject). I think, though, this is the short version: 

The US has a massive debt (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;$9,065,972,660,762.03&lt;/a&gt; as of 30 Oct 2007 at 07:05:07 PM GMT). That debt is owned by other countries. The higher the value of the US dollar, the heavier that debt is with other countries. So -- apparently -- the goal is to devalue the US dollar so other countries aren&#039;t crushed by the unpaid debt. Or at least that seems to be the theory. 

But like I said, I&#039;m no economist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was just having a chat with my friend Joel, who pointed out that the dollar&#8217;s slide/rise (depending on which one you&#8217;re looking at) isn&#8217;t a result of the Prez. It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/wibbelsman050206.html" rel="nofollow">US monetary policy</a>. </p>
<p>Now, both of us freely admit that this is a little bit on the incomprehensible side (macroeconomics wasn&#8217;t my strong subject). I think, though, this is the short version: </p>
<p>The US has a massive debt (<a href="http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/" rel="nofollow">$9,065,972,660,762.03</a> as of 30 Oct 2007 at 07:05:07 PM GMT). That debt is owned by other countries. The higher the value of the US dollar, the heavier that debt is with other countries. So &#8212; apparently &#8212; the goal is to devalue the US dollar so other countries aren&#8217;t crushed by the unpaid debt. Or at least that seems to be the theory. </p>
<p>But like I said, I&#8217;m no economist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

